Has the field today become exactly what the Imam wanted? Mohammad Kazem Taghavi
The focus of the centers and scientific environments is to provide a variety of views and perspectives, to engage in “dialogue” with the highest standards and ideas to guide the future.
Particularly in the last hundred years, some field leaders and groups of scholars and scholars have attempted to create a more orderly and tailor-made order in order to run the districts differently from the traditional order for greater efficiency. Be it. Until after the victory of the Islamic Revolution led by Imam Khomeini (SA) under the guidance of the noble authorities and the participation and responsibility of high-ranking professors, regular and centralized administration of the constituencies was established, and in recent decades, courses have been established. But both in terms of management knowledge, the output and efficiency of the system must be considered and ethically evaluated, and not only the individuals themselves but also the centers and communities themselves must “calculate” themselves. They tell us what we did and what we do and where we are. What is our behavior and what is the outcome of our actions and where are we in assessing the current situation with the purpose we initially sought to chart and promise to achieve?
Imam Khomeini (SA), who at the beginning of the service of the Supreme Leader and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Boroujerdi (Qods Sareh), together with his like-minded friends in the field of organization and unfortunately did not tolerate those thoughts in the field, thought about the existence of ideas and Various views on constituencies says!
“The books of the great scholars of Islam are full of disagreements and tastes in different fields … as long as there is a consensus or opposition to the issues that are claimed to be consensus, and even consensus may be promising. Otherwise it will be found “(Sahifah Imam, vol. 2, p. 176).
He says in the context of the post-revolutionary Shi’a seminary, and in the context of a new world, new issues and questions, “If some issues were not raised in the past, or No matter, the jurists today have to think about it “(Ibid.)
And he says in a clear and expressive voice: “Therefore, in the Islamic state there must always be openness to ijtihad, and the nature of the revolution and the system always demands that the ijtihad-jurisprudential ideas be disseminated freely in opposition to one another and that one can And it does not have the right to prevent it. “(The same)
It seems that the sentences quoted by the Imam itself represent a goal that we should have achieved in a new era with better and better organized order. But did it really happen ?! What is the threshold of tolerance by the constituency and its managers?
Is it good to be tolerant of others, is it only good for others, or is it an essential duty of all?
Unfortunately, if we evaluate and pathologize the realistic – not pessimistic – state of affairs in the seminaries, we see that we have not made much progress than we have in the past. Do not be surprised, for example, in the forties of the Najaf seminary of Ashraf, two of the great Shi’a jurists and the first Shi’a authorities on the subject of Velayat-e Faqih in the field of public affairs and public affairs, each in their own field of study and later in the books they wrote, two They expressed a completely different and distinct view, and the field endured that day.
Imam Khomeini (SA) in his lesson and book Bai raised his theories in well-reasoned political jurisprudence which itself became a turning point and in the same period Ayatollah Khu’i’s well-known jurisprudence took a different view.
But what did we do? Let me just point out that the late Grand Ayatollah Mirza Ali Agha Philosophy (RA) was told not to teach the Velayat-e Faqih. Why? Because you have a different perspective!
We did not print the works of the late Ayatollah Araki (Qods Sareh), a prominent disciple of the late Hajj Sheikh Abdul Karim Haeri (Quds Sareh), a section of the Supreme Leader of the Jurisprudence, which was about seventy pages long.
Imam Khomeini himself explicitly says that different and dissenting opinions should also be considered, but in the name of defending Imam’s point of view, we prevent or disagree with his views!
I refrain from reproducing proverbs and theories, pointing to the last bitter fruit of this narrow-minded approach, which endangered the existence of seminaries, and it is unfortunate that during the Year Book Ceremony. Happened!
More or less readers are aware of the incident, namely the elimination of the names of two of the top scholars who produced separate scholarly and innovative works.
Honorable Ayatollah Seyyed Zia Mortazavi, author of a research book on the subject of “Menopause,” and the Honorable Professor of Hojat al-Islam, Dr. Davood Farhii, has written a book “Jurisprudence and Politics” in Contemporary Iran that is undoubtedly an exquisite and scholarly work.
If in the past, and as mentioned above, the research goes into the law, the experts would have acknowledged the value of the investigation, but the executives were skeptical that the “top researchers” had taken the field! A bad tradition that has taken other scholars into the law years ago.
These are scholars who are not only successful in the field of science but also in the virtues of virtue and humility. Ayatollah Mortazavi’s scholars and scholars know that in addition to his legal and interpretive positions as well as education, teaching and research, he has been an active and dedicated editor for about fifteen years, and a five-year editor-in-chief of the Islamic State Journal Quarterly Secretariat. The Assembly of Experts – under the presidency of Ayatollah Amini – has a successful record of five years as head of the Research Center of the Secretariat of Experts and five years as head of the Institute of Jurisprudence and Law of the Institute of Culture and Islamic Sciences and many other accomplishments that he has had and is proud of during Holy Defense. Not only is he at the front, he is proud to have a number of his relatives May his dear brother be a martyr for Imam Khomeini and the revolution. Yes, such a successful academic person will be taken to the law, perhaps because he wrote “Ijtihad in the Law” and “Keep the Imamate of the Faithful”!
His Excellency Dr. Firihi was also a distinguished professor of the University of Tehran with great diligence in the field of jurisprudence and the principles of great interest, especially in jurisprudence and principles, and in addition to teaching successfully at Tehran University and Qom academic centers and writing articles and interviews. Numerous books and various books are an honorary research for the post-revolutionary field and the scientific community of the country.
Shouldn’t we weep over such a situation ?!
Should not the noble scholars of the field, who these scholars cherish and their scientific children recognize, think of the Imamate of the time and maintain the independence of Imam Sadiq (as) and the interference of the centers and the hands they bake? Is it so bitter and harmful to prevent the field of theology from the realm of science and truth in order to produce real science and thought, to pave the way for our many questions and needs today and tomorrow? It is hoped that this “evil” will be “good” and that the awakening be to wake the neglected, to wake the malevolent and the perverse, and to sweeten the Islamic society